On suffering and the “why” question, the 6.9 out of 7.0 agnostic Richard Dawkins essentially says don’t bother asking. In his final chapter of The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution, Dawkins expands on each line in Darwin’s last paragraph of On the Origin of Species. As Dawkins develops the line “From the war of nature, from famine and death,” he argues that nature has a “serene indifference” to suffering.
Yes there is grandeur in the view of this life, and even a kind of grandeur in nature’s serene indifference to the suffering that inexorably follows in the wake of its guiding principle, survival of the fittest (Richard Dawkins, The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution [New York: Free Press, 2009], 401).
This is the best evolution has to offer to the suffering human race; this is best bedside comfort Darwinism offers a dying person. Give him credit for consistency. Nevertheless, indifference to suffering is part of the DNA of natural selection. What an arid, inhumane worldview.
Contrast this to the Christian worldview in which there is a Creator, who is neither detached nor indifferent to human suffering. In fact, He entered into it by sending His son, Jesus Christ to live and die among us. His Son suffered on the cross and rose again on the third day so that suffering brought on by sin would one day be entirely eradicated.
And I heard a loud voice from the throne saying, “Behold, the dwelling place of God is with man. He will dwell with them, and they will be his people, and God himself will be with them as their God.  He will wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death shall be no more, neither shall there be mourning, nor crying, nor pain anymore, for the former things have passed away” (Revelation 21:3-4).
Ideas have consequences, don’t they? One may argue that on its face evolution is scientifically sophisticated (though this premise is not at all firmly or finally established). Even if it were, it is absolutely useless for offering hope to a suffering human race.