Comments for Sententia

Comment on Love Yourself Before You Love Your Neighbor by Jeremy

Jeremy — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:45:58 +0000

The inevitable result of little to no exegesis, and much to total eisegesis. . .

Comment on Insanity. Pure Insanity. by Jim Peet

Jim Peet — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:36:05 +0000

Of course the bizarre thing is that this idiot gets a ton of free publicity – à la the worldly adage “The Only Bad Publicity Is No Publicity”

Article is dated but of interest: The bad publicity factor

Keep up the good work!

Comment on A Hairy Shirt? Where Neurology and Anthropology Intersect by Doug Roman

Doug Roman — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:30:15 +0000

Yeah, I know . . . is there a pill to supress cravings for Famous Dave’s? I’d almost be willing to give it a go!

Comment on A Hairy Shirt? Where Neurology and Anthropology Intersect by jaynepomuceno

jaynepomuceno — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:25:07 +0000

That would be, “Well written…” I usually know how to use commas.

Comment on A Hairy Shirt? Where Neurology and Anthropology Intersect by jaynepomuceno

jaynepomuceno — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:23:20 +0000

Wow, fascinating! You shoulda left out the part about gluttony. That’s just meddling!

Well, written, my friend.

Comment on A Hairy Shirt? Where Neurology and Anthropology Intersect by Doug Roman

Doug Roman — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 02:47:02 +0000

Makes for great irony doesn’t it? Thanks for stopping by.

Comment on A Hairy Shirt? Where Neurology and Anthropology Intersect by mskelli

mskelli — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 02:35:51 +0000

I love it when people try to “prove” there is no God and end up basically confirming things that the Bible teaches. It makes me so happy!!

Comment on Happy Birthday Bible Baptist Church by Julie Roman

Julie Roman — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:13:22 +0000

Amen! It’s exciting to be a part of this ministry.

Comment on Frank Schaeffer: Fundamentalist Christianity is the USA’s ‘Village Idiot’ by Doug Roman

Doug Roman — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 02:06:27 +0000

Bob J.,

I understand the context of the video. And I freely concede that those who view Obama as the antichrist may be couching their staunch opposition against him in these terms.

My contention is that Schaeffer’s comments are painted with a very broad brush.

While I do not personally hold to the view that Obama is the antichrist, can you say for certain he is not? For the sake of argument, what if he is? Then turns out you, Schaeffer, and Maddow, among others are the ignorant ones. Again, to be clear, I do not affirm the concept that Obama is the antichrist. I’m simply cautioning against your stance. The antichrist will be a political figure, after all. You assert a categorical denial about something you cannot prove to be true, namely that Obama is not the antichrist.

Moreover, Schaeffer’s other problem is his flow of thought: people who think Obama is the antichrist and was not born in the US = people who “distrust facts, per se.” My reply: non sequitur.

Comment on What to do with the Johannine Comma? by jm

jm — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 00:00:20 +0000

There are a few helpful links on my blog written by Steve Rafalsky who presents a Reformed view of the textual issues worth looking at.

http://feileadhmor.wordpress.com/2008/09/26/jerusalem-blades-posts/